Tutorial 18: Simplified Universal Instantiation
10/12/26
Skill to be acquired:
To understand the concepts of scope, free, bound. To meet substitution and a simplified version of the rule for removing a Universal Quantifier.
10/12/26
To understand the concepts of scope, free, bound. To meet substitution and a simplified version of the rule for removing a Universal Quantifier.
We will certainly wish to discuss the truth and falsity of formulas with quantifiers in them.
Let us start with an Interpretation
Interpretation 1
Universe= {a,b}
F={a}
10/12/26
To learn how to use the Universal and Existential Quantifiers in symbolizing propositions.
In Predicate Logic there are two new logical connectives, the Universal Quantifier (x) and the Existential Quantifier (∃x). These are used for symbolizing certain English constructions (they also have their own rules of inference and their own semantics, which we will learn about later).
The propositional rules of derivation carry over unchanged into Predicate Logic
A few concepts are needed give a simple portrayal of the truth and falsity of predicate logic formulas.
There is the notion of an Interpretation which consists of a Universe together with an account of how the various symbols in the predicate logic formulas apply in this Universe.
There should be a Universe, which is the collection of the objects that the formulas is about. We write, for example,
Universe = {a,b,c}
10/12/26
To learn how to interpret simple predicate logic formulas as being true or false.
This helps in proving invalidity by the technique of displaying a counter-example.
In propositional logic, we just took it that each of the atomic propositions either is true or is false-- we did not look into the structure of the propositions.
Truth can be discussed in more detail in predicate logic.
A start can be made in predicate logic by taking apart 'atomic' propositions and by re-phrasing what they have to say in a 'entity-has-property' way.
The constant terms a,b,c...h are used to denote entities, the predicates A,B,C...Z are used to denote properties that these entities have, and these are put together by writing the predicate first followed by the term, for example Gb.
In predicate logic, many different styles of expression in English get cast into the same 'property-is-had-by-entity' form. For example,
Beryl is wise. (ie adjective)
Beryl runs. (ie verb)
Beryl is a philosopher. (ie noun)
might be symbolized Wb, Rb, and Pb, respectively.
To start learning how to symbolize propositions using predicate logic.
There are many valid arguments which cannot be shown to be valid using propositional logic alone. For example,
Beryl is a philosopher.
All philosophers are wise.
Therefore
Beryl is wise.
10/12/26
You now have to tools to appraise propositional arguments.
Let us run through how these might be used with two examples.
Consider the argument
If no human action is free, then no one is responsible for what they do.
If no one is responsible for what they do, no one should be punished.
Therefore
If no human action is free, no one should be punished.
First it should be symbolized